Title: Scivias Author: Hildegard of Bingen Creation Date: c. 1151 Location: Germany Collection: Women Who Wrote When They Weren't Supposed To
Brief
Hildegard of Bingen completed Scivias — from Scito vias Domini, "Know the Ways of the Lord" — around 1151, having worked on it for roughly a decade with the assistance of her secretary, the monk Volmar, and her favoured novice Richardis von Stade, who helped her render her dictated Latin into polished written form. Hildegard was by then in her early fifties and had been a Benedictine nun since she was a small child, given by her parents to the anchoress Jutta of Sponheim as an oblate at the age of eight. Her reputation in the Rhineland was already substantial when she began Scivias; she had become magistra of her community of nuns after Jutta's death in 1136. What transformed her from a respected local figure into a European one was a single event: sometime around 1147, a delegation from the Synod of Trier carried a partial draft of Scivias to Pope Eugenius III, who had the text read aloud in front of the assembled bishops and issued a formal letter endorsing the work and authorising her to continue writing. A woman's prophetic theological writings being endorsed by the papacy was, in the twelfth century, an exceptional event. It made Scivias one of the earliest books by a woman ever granted such explicit recognition in the Latin West.
Scivias consists of three books organised around twenty-six visions. Each vision is described first in vivid visual and spatial terms — often with extraordinary precision of imagery — and is then followed by a long theological explication in which a voice (the vox de caelo, "voice from heaven") interprets each element of the vision for the reader. Hildegard insists throughout that she received her visions in a waking state rather than in dreams or ecstasies, that she perceived them in what she calls "the living Light" (lux vivens) alongside ordinary sensory perception, and that she had experienced this dual mode of seeing since early childhood without fully understanding what it meant. The first book concerns the relationship of Creator to creation, from the fall of Lucifer to the creation of humanity. The second concerns the architecture of salvation — the Church, the sacraments, the place of laity and clergy. The third concerns eschatology: the last days, the Antichrist, the Last Judgement, and the restored cosmos.
What makes Scivias canonical is its fusion of mystical vision with systematic theology, its unusual visual imagination (the manuscript illuminations created under Hildegard's own supervision at the Rupertsberg convent are among the most distinctive images in medieval art), and above all its voice: a woman claiming direct divine authority within an institution that formally excluded women from teaching doctrine. Hildegard solved this problem with a phrase that recurs throughout her writings — she is, she says, only a poor little figure, a feather carried on the breath of God, an instrument rather than an author. The image became her signature and her protection. It is both a genuine theological claim about receptivity to revelation and a tactically brilliant move within a church that could not have accepted a woman writing theology in any other voice.
The Prohibition
The prohibition Hildegard worked within was the standard prohibition of the Latin medieval church against women's public teaching authority. Canon law, following the Pauline injunctions in 1 Corinthians 14 and 1 Timothy 2, held that women were not to teach or preach publicly, were not to exercise authority over men, and were not to hold ecclesiastical office. Women were excluded from the cathedral schools that would, by the later twelfth century, develop into the universities of Paris, Bologna, and Oxford. The language of theology was Latin, which women of Hildegard's class learned in convents only through the liturgy and the Psalter and rarely with the full scholastic competence demanded of male clerics. A woman who claimed to speak publicly about God was, in the structural logic of the twelfth-century church, either a saint under ecclesiastical supervision or a suspect figure whose claims required careful containment.
Hildegard's situation was in one important respect different from that of most twelfth-century religious women: she was a member of a Benedictine community whose charism specifically included the contemplative life and whose abbesses had, since figures like Lioba in the eighth century, occasionally exercised substantial local authority. Benedictine abbesses could run their own houses, manage extensive landed estates, correspond with bishops, and receive ecclesiastical visitors. What they could not do was write doctrine, preach outside their own cloisters, or claim the kind of authoritative theological voice that scholastic training conferred on men. Hildegard's move in Scivias was to claim a different kind of authority altogether — not the scholastic authority of the trained theologian but the prophetic authority of the visionary, who speaks not in her own name but as a transparent instrument of divine revelation.
The specifically dangerous element of this claim was that prophetic authority was itself a contested and regulated category. The church had long recognised that individual men and women could receive direct visions from God; it had equally long reserved the right to decide whose visions were authentic and whose were delusions or demonic deceptions. A woman claiming prophetic status was especially vulnerable to the discernment of spirits being applied against her — she could be classed as a saint, a hysteric, or a heretic depending on who examined her and how. The Investiture Controversy and the Gregorian reform movement of the late eleventh and twelfth centuries had intensified clerical anxiety about unauthorised religious speech, and by the 1140s the condemnations of the populist preacher Henry of Lausanne and the theologian Peter Abelard had made the limits of acceptable theological voice very sharp. Hildegard wrote into this charged environment, and her choice to seek papal endorsement at Trier was not pious incidentalism. It was a calculated move to place her work under an authority that no local bishop could easily overturn.
The Strategy
The preface to Scivias is Hildegard speaking in her own voice before the visions begin, and it is worth reading as a piece of careful rhetorical positioning. She describes the experience of revelation: the Living Light and what she calls the Reflection of the Living Light, which she says she has perceived since early childhood without understanding what it meant. She is explicit that she did not receive her visions in dream-states or ecstasies — she was awake, she says, looking at the world, and the interior illumination arrived alongside normal waking perception. She also describes her illness: a physical prostration that she interprets as the consequence of resisting the command to write. When she finally agreed to commit her visions to writing, in obedience to a voice from heaven that commanded "Write what you see and hear," her illness lifted and she was able to work.
This framing is doing serious rhetorical work. Hildegard is pre-emptively answering the question any reader will bring to a woman's theological text in the twelfth century: what authority do you have? Her answer is that the authority is not hers. She did not choose to receive these visions; she was given them. She did not decide to write them; she was commanded to write, and her body would not allow her to refuse. The feather-on-the-breath-of-God image recurs throughout her letters and later works: she is merely carried by divine wind, not flying under her own power. This humility is the enabling strategy for everything else she will say, which is a great deal and is often radical. A woman writing theology in her own authority would be suspect; a woman transcribing what God has shown her is, within the discernment-of-spirits framework the church provided, a category the church knew how to process.
The second element of her strategy was her insistence on obedience to ecclesiastical authority at every level. She wrote to popes, bishops, abbots, and emperors throughout her life, and her letters repeatedly perform the same gesture: she speaks as the mouthpiece of God, she rebukes corruption and laxity with prophetic severity, and she always frames her rebuke as a message she has been commanded to deliver rather than an opinion she holds. She pursued papal endorsement actively — the delegation to Trier in 1147 was something she had engineered through her correspondence with Bernard of Clairvaux, the most influential churchman of the age, who had read a portion of Scivias and recommended it to the Pope. Eugenius III had come out of the Cistercian world in which Bernard's voice carried enormous weight, and the endorsement Hildegard secured was not luck; it was the product of a deliberate campaign to place her work under the highest possible institutional protection before it could be attacked from below.
The third element was sheer productivity across an astonishing range of fields. Hildegard did not only write Scivias. She composed the two later visionary books that form the trilogy: the Liber Vitae Meritorum on the virtues and vices, and the Liber Divinorum Operum, her cosmological masterwork on the ordering of creation. She composed music — more than seventy liturgical songs and the Ordo Virtutum, an early morality play with sung parts. She wrote books on natural science (the Physica) and medicine (the Causae et Curae), cataloguing plants, stones, animals, and the humoral constitution of the human body with empirical curiosity. She founded two convents — first Rupertsberg, breaking away from the double monastery at Disibodenberg, and later Eibingen — against significant local opposition. She travelled across Germany preaching publicly in several cities, which was itself a near-unprecedented action for a woman. The volume and variety of her output made her impossible to ignore or dismiss; she was not a single anomalous book but an entire intellectual operation running out of a convent on the Rhine.
The Price and the Legacy
The price Hildegard paid was more subtle than outright suppression, because her strategy of authorised prophecy largely worked, but it was real. She was periodically in conflict with ecclesiastical superiors throughout her life, particularly the abbots at Disibodenberg who resisted her move to Rupertsberg and later tried to retain control over her new foundation and its revenues. She suffered recurrent physical illness that both she and her biographers interpreted as the cost of her visionary calling — bouts of prostration that confined her to bed, sometimes for extended periods. She lost her beloved Richardis von Stade when Richardis's family used ecclesiastical influence to have her transferred to another convent as abbess; Hildegard wrote anguished letters trying to prevent the move, and when Richardis died shortly afterward Hildegard grieved publicly and wrote about the loss as a wound she could not close.
The most serious institutional conflict came at the end of her life. In 1178, the year before her death, her convent at Rupertsberg was placed under interdict by the prelates of Mainz because the community had permitted the burial in consecrated ground of a nobleman whom the ecclesiastical authorities considered an excommunicate. Hildegard refused to exhume the body. She wrote fierce letters defending the burial, arguing that the man had been reconciled to the church before his death and that the interdict was unjust. The interdict meant that her nuns could not celebrate Mass or sing the Divine Office — a devastating punishment for a community whose life was built on liturgical song. The interdict was eventually lifted shortly before Hildegard's death in September 1179, but the conflict was a reminder that even the most carefully constructed ecclesiastical standing a woman could achieve in the twelfth century remained vulnerable to the will of local male authorities.
The legacy is extraordinary and has grown steadily across the centuries since her death. Scivias circulated in manuscript through the late Middle Ages and was read in monastic communities across Germany and beyond, but Hildegard's broader cultural visibility declined after the Reformation and she became, for several hundred years, a relatively obscure figure known mostly to specialists. Her rediscovery in the modern period came in stages. Nineteenth-century German medievalists began publishing editions of her works. Her music was rediscovered in the late twentieth century and recorded by early-music ensembles, whose recordings introduced her compositions to a wide modern audience. Her medical and natural-scientific writings attracted interest from historians of science. Feminist theologians and historians of women's religious experience — Barbara Newman, Sabina Flanagan, Peter Dronke, Caroline Walker Bynum — produced the scholarly apparatus that made her readable as a major thinker. In 2012, Pope Benedict XVI formally canonised her and declared her a Doctor of the Church, a title held by only a handful of figures in the entire history of Latin Christianity and only four women: Catherine of Siena, Teresa of Ávila, Thérèse of Lisieux, and now Hildegard. Between her death and the conferral of that title, eight hundred and thirty-three years had passed.
The Reading
In the year of our Lord's incarnation 1141, when I was forty-two years and seven months old, a fiery light of tremendous brightness came from the opened heavens and poured through my entire brain, and kindled my heart and my breast not like a burning but like a warming flame, as the sun warms a thing on which it casts its rays. And in that moment I understood the meaning of the books of scripture — the Psalter, the Gospels, the Epistles — not through the study of grammar or the interpretation of any human teacher, but as a gift of immediate illumination in the living Light. I had known this Light since I was a child of three, had seen it alongside ordinary seeing, but I had not understood what it was. And now the voice from heaven commanded me: Write what you see and hear. I resisted. I was a poor little figure, a woman who did not know how to write as the learned men wrote, and I feared the presumption of it. My body fell into prostrating illness. Only when I obeyed — when I began to dictate the visions to my faithful secretary Volmar, with the help of my beloved novice Richardis — did the illness lift and my strength return.
I set down what I was given, and what I was given was this.
I saw a great mountain the colour of iron, and on it sat One of such dazzling brightness that the face could not be seen, and from this figure rays of light streamed down to a small image crouching at the mountain's foot. The small image was myself — or any soul that has recognised its own smallness and thereby begun to see. The iron mountain is the immutability of God's kingdom; the dazzling figure is the eternity of God; the streams of light are the gifts of the Spirit that lead the soul toward holiness. The voice from heaven interpreted each element as I beheld it, and I set the interpretation beside the vision as I had been told to do, so that the seeing and the understanding would be one text.
Then I saw a great globe surrounded by whirling stars, and I watched as some of the stars were torn from their places and fell, becoming black and horrible as they fell. These were the rebel angels, cast down by the power of God's command. The space they vacated in the heavens became the empty shape that humanity was created to fill. The universe is organised around the absence left by the fall, and every human being who is born enters the place an angel refused to keep.
When I saw the creation of Adam and Eve, I saw them placed within a cosmic geometry. The human body corresponds to the structure of the cosmos: the head is like the firmament, the humours correspond to the elements, the breath of the soul is likened to the wind that moves the heavens. The body is not an afterthought of creation but its crown, the place where the cosmic order is made personal. I who have spent my years observing the properties of plants and stones and the constitutions of the sick know this in my hands as well as in the Light: the body is not a problem to be transcended but a creation to be understood. The soul and the body are made for each other, and their separation at death is a kind of violence that the resurrection will repair.
The visions of the first book move through the patriarchs and prophets, the giving of the Law, the long waiting of Israel for the Messiah, and into the Incarnation. Among these visions the allegorical figures are consistently feminine. Ecclesia — the Church — appears as a woman of formidable beauty, crowned and regal, whose long robe is visibly torn and stained. The stains are the work of corrupt clergy. She is magnificent and she is damaged, and the damage has been done by the very men appointed to protect her. I was given this vision and I set it down: the Church is a woman whose body has been violated by those who should have been her guardians. The gender of the figure is not ornament. It is the argument.
The second book turns to the sacramental order: baptism, confirmation, the priestly office, the Eucharist, penance, and marriage. Each sacrament was given its own vision in the living Light. I saw the priest celebrating Mass, and what I saw was this: a tower descending from heaven and a great throng of angels and saints surrounding the altar, and the sacrifice of the Mass shown as continuous with the sacrifice on Calvary, extending across all time rather than merely repeating a past event. I saw baptism as a washing in cosmic fire, confirmation as a sealing of the Spirit's mark upon the forehead, penance as the soul's slow climb back from a ditch it had fallen into by its own negligence. Each vision was spatial, architectural — I saw the sacraments as structures one could walk through, rooms in which the soul takes on its proper shape.
The treatment of marriage I was given surprised even me. The vision insisted on the sacredness of physical union within lawful marriage and spoke against those who teach that the body is evil. There are those who preach that the flesh is the devil's domain, that purity requires its mortification, that the bearing of children is a concession to fallen nature. This is wrong. I have studied the body — its humours, its elements, its cycles of generation and decay — in my work on the natural world, and I know what I have been shown in the Light: the body is not the soul's prison but its companion, made in the same workshop by the same Craftsman. The woman's body in particular, with its cycles and its capacity for generation, participates in the cosmic order as directly as the turning of the spheres. Those who would deny this participate in the very error that cast the rebel angels from their places.
The third book concerns the last things, and it is here that the visions strain toward music. I saw the Symphony of the Blessed — the music of heaven — and what I heard was what I had always heard in the living Light, the sound that had accompanied the visions since childhood, the sound I had tried to capture in the chants I composed for my sisters at Rupertsberg. The cosmos is a song. Holiness is participation in the song. Damnation is the inability to hear it or produce it.
In the penultimate vision I saw the drama of a single soul caught between the Virtues and the Devil. The Virtues — Humility, Charity, Obedience, Faith, Hope, and the others — sang to the soul in high clear voices, each calling her by name, each offering a hand. The Devil could not sing. Music is harmony, harmony is consonance with the divine order, and the Devil, who has placed himself outside that order, is limited to a harsh spoken croak. He cannot produce what he has refused to be. The soul that wanders away from the Virtues has been lured not into noise but into silence — the terrible silence of a creature cut off from the song that sustains everything that lives. I gave this vision its own musical form, the Ordo Virtutum, a play in which the Virtues sing and the Devil speaks and the distance between the two modes of utterance carries the whole theological argument in the sound itself. When, decades later, the prelates of Mainz placed my convent under interdict and forbade my sisters from singing the Divine Office, I understood in my body what I had seen in the Light: to silence the choir is to impose damnation's condition on the community of the faithful.
The final visions concern the Antichrist, whose coming is described through a sequence of cosmic disruptions — stars displaced, seasons confused, the elements warring against each other — and the Last Judgement, in which the souls of all humanity are arrayed before the throne and sorted according to their works. Then I saw the New Heaven and the New Earth. What I saw was a geometry of light: the heavens rebuilt, the elements purified, the restored order of the cosmos shown as a set of spatial relations I could walk through as one walks through the rooms of a well-ordered house. The renewed creation is not a feeling. It is a structure, as precise as the cosmos it replaces, and its precision is its beauty.
Each vision in these three books operates on at least three levels at once: the literal image as I see it in the living Light, the allegorical meaning the voice from heaven declares, and the moral demand it places on the soul of the reader. Every image is a room the reader enters, and the room contains instruction. The iron-coloured mountain teaches the immutability of God. The falling stars teach the cost of refusal. The torn robe of Ecclesia teaches what happens when the shepherds neglect the flock. The geometry of the New Heaven teaches what the cosmos looks like when nothing in it has turned away from its Maker. I did not invent these rooms. I was shown them, and I set down what I was shown, and I set it down faithfully, because the voice that commanded me to write did not grant me the liberty of silence.
The manuscript illuminations — painted under my own direction at Rupertsberg, in a style I do not recognise in any other book of my century — are part of what I was given. Each vision is meant to be seen as well as read. The colours are coded: the gold of divine presence, the iron grey of earthly strength, the red of the Spirit's fire, the black of the fallen angels. The spatial relationships in the illuminations are deliberate: the cosmic eggs, the fiery circles, the towers of light carry theological meaning in their geometry as well as their labels. The reader who sees the illuminations alongside the text receives the visions as they came to me — not in words alone but in the living Light that burns and warms at once.
I am a poor little figure and a feather on the breath of God, and I have said only what I was told to say. But what I was told to say filled three books and twenty-six visions and it took me ten years to dictate it, and when the Holy Father Eugenius had it read before the bishops at Trier and gave his approval I understood that the voice that commanded me had also protected me. A woman who writes theology in her own name is a suspect figure. A woman who transcribes what God has shown her is a category the Church knows how to receive. I did not choose the category. I was placed in it by the same hand that placed me in the living Light at three years old, and I have remained in it for the whole of my long life, because the alternative was silence, and the Light would not permit silence.
After Scivias came the two books that completed the trilogy: the Liber Vitae Meritorum, in which the virtues and vices speak to each other in voices I heard in the Light, each virtue shining and each vice twisted into a form that shows what it has done to the soul it inhabits; and the Liber Divinorum Operum, my cosmological work, in which the vast figure I had seen since childhood — a human form containing the entire universe within its body, the microcosm and the macrocosm shown as one structure — received its full description. Alongside these I composed the music: more than seventy liturgical songs whose melodies soar to extremes of pitch my sisters' voices had to strain to reach, because the sound I heard in the Light was always higher and more distant than the sound the human throat can produce, and I wanted the singing to reach toward it even if it could not arrive. The songs are my own — not drawn from the standard liturgy but from the visions themselves, addressed to the Virgin, to the saints, to the cosmic order, in words that belong to the Light rather than to the conventions of the chant repertoire.
I also wrote on the natural world — the properties of plants and stones and animals, the constitutions of the human body, the causes and cures of illness — because the same Light that showed me the architecture of heaven showed me the architecture of the body, and the two architectures are one. The soul is carried in the body as wind is carried in a horn, and the sound they make together is the sound of a life being lived inside the order God established. To study the body is to study the cosmos in miniature. To heal the body is to participate in the work of restoration that will reach its completion only at the end of all things, when the elements are purified and the heavens rebuilt and the geometry of light replaces the geometry of shadow.
I have been a feather on the breath of God. I have been a poor little figure crouching at the foot of the iron mountain. I have also been an abbess who fought the monks of Disibodenberg for her convent's independence, who founded two houses against significant opposition, who preached across Germany in an age when women did not preach, who buried a nobleman the prelates said was excommunicate and refused to dig him up, and who suffered the interdict's silencing of her choir for months before the ban was lifted and my sisters could sing again. The feather and the fighter are the same woman, and Scivias is the book that made both possible — the book that placed my voice under an authority no bishop could overturn, and that carried forward, in twenty-six visions dictated to a monk in a convent on the Rhine, a word I was too frightened to speak until the illness forced me and too stubborn to stop speaking once I had begun.
This post is part of Women Who Wrote When They Weren't Supposed To, a series on women writing against the constraints of their time. See the full collection →
The only complete English translation is by Columba Hart and Jane Bishop (Paulist Press, 1990), in the Classics of Western Spirituality series. It includes Hildegard's own illuminations and a detailed scholarly introduction.
Translated by Columba Hart and Jane Bishop. The only complete English translation — in the prestigious Classics of Western Spirituality series.
Disclaimer: some links in this post are affiliate links. If you buy through them, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.