Title: The Moor's Last Sigh Author: Salman Rushdie Creation Date: 1995 Location: London Collection: Banned, Burned & Dangerous Books
Brief
Salman Rushdie published The Moor's Last Sigh in September 1995, six years into the exile imposed by Ayatollah Khomeini's fatwa against him for The Satanic Verses. The novel was his return to Bombay — the city where he grew up and which he had reimagined across multiple books as the archetype of everything a civilisation might be when it refuses to simplify itself. It is a four-generation family saga of the Zogoiby-da Gama dynasty — Catholic spice merchants of Jewish and Moorish heritage in Cochin, later transplanted to Bombay — narrated by Moraes Zogoiby, known as the Moor, a man cursed with a genetic condition that causes him to age at twice the normal rate. At thirty-five he looks seventy, his time running out with a velocity that gives the novel's already urgent prose an additional register of desperation. Written in Rushdie's maximalist, spice-saturated, time-collapsing style, it is simultaneously family saga, political allegory, art-world satire, and civilisational elegy.
The title refers to Boabdil, the last Moorish king of Granada, who wept on leaving the Alhambra in 1492. Rushdie proposes that Bombay's syncretic civilisation — its three-thousand-year accumulation of communities, languages, faiths, and cuisines — is itself a kind of Andalusia, and that its destruction by ethnic nationalism constitutes a second expulsion, a second last sigh. The novel won the Whitbread Novel Award in 1995 and received broad international praise. In India, within weeks of publication, it was banned by the Maharashtra state government, its bookshops ransacked by Shiv Sena activists who recognised in one of its characters a portrait of their leader, Bal Thackeray.
The Banning
Within weeks of publication, Bal Thackeray publicly identified himself as the model for Raman Fielding — a xenophobic politician in the novel who maintains a private zoo, commands a militia, expresses admiration for Hitler, and builds his power on ethnic cleansing. Rushdie had drawn from Thackeray's publicly known characteristics with a directness unusual even by his standards: the love of exotic animals, the history of orchestrating anti-Muslim violence during the 1992-93 Bombay riots, the openly stated fascist sympathies. The resemblance was arguable, but Thackeray chose to make it undeniable by claiming it himself.
Shiv Sena activists ransacked bookshops displaying the novel across Bombay — organised demonstrations of the party's ability to enforce its will on the city's commercial life. Booksellers who valued their windows removed the book from their shelves without waiting for instruction. The Maharashtra state government, in which the Shiv Sena was the senior coalition partner, moved to ban the book under public order provisions. Thackeray filed a criminal defamation complaint. The Bombay High Court stayed and ultimately lifted the ban, ruling that while the character resemblance was arguable, the novel was a work of literary fiction protected under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution — the guarantee of free expression. The ruling was a significant legal affirmation, but its practical effect was limited. The Shiv Sena's capacity for violence required no legal authorisation, and booksellers had already drawn the obvious conclusion. The effective suppression was accomplished not by formal prohibition but by the combination of street violence, legal proceedings, and the credible threat of further disruption — a mechanism that required no censorship board, only the willingness to break windows.
The Fallout
The controversy was the second major censorship crisis in Rushdie's career, structurally connected to the fatwa. He had written The Moor's Last Sigh as an act of literary re-engagement with India, and its suppression demonstrated that the conditions which made The Satanic Verses dangerous had intensified rather than abated. Rushdie could not travel to India — the fatwa made any public appearance a security risk, and the Shiv Sena's threats added a specifically Indian layer of danger. The court's lifting of the ban was a legal victory but did not undo the damage already accomplished by broken glass.
Internationally, the novel won the Whitbread and received broadly positive critical response. In India, the controversy overshadowed the literary achievement: the book was discussed as a political event rather than a novel. Thackeray led the Shiv Sena until his death in 2012, and the party continued threatening bookshops, cinemas, and galleries that displayed works it found objectionable — part of a pattern that included attacks on M.F. Husain's paintings and academic works challenging Hindutva historical narratives. Rushdie drew explicit connections between the Shiv Sena's response and the Islamic response to The Satanic Verses, arguing that both cases demonstrated a structural similarity between religious and ethnic nationalism: both demanded the right to determine what could be said about them, both used violence to enforce that demand, and both found in the existence of an imaginative literature about their sacred subjects an intolerable provocation. The comparison placed Hindu nationalism and Islamic radicalism on the same analytical plane — a framing neither constituency welcomed, and which confirmed, for Rushdie, that he had described something real.
Why It Was Feared
What Thackeray and the Shiv Sena understood was that the novel was not merely an unflattering portrait of a politician but a diagnosis of the political logic their movement represented — the logic of ethnic purification, of reducing a plural city to a single identity. The Raman Fielding portrait was dangerous not because it was satirical but because it was embedded in a narrative that made the reader feel the cost of what Fielding represented. Rushdie did not make the mistake of underestimating his villain: he gave Fielding the charisma and the cunning that made the real movement effective, and the result was a character who frightened precisely because he was convincing — because the reader could see why people followed him, could feel the seductive power of his certainty in a world offering no other certainties.
The Zogoiby family — Catholic, Jewish, Moorish, hybrid by history — embodied the Bombay the Shiv Sena was working to destroy. Aurora's paintings of a Moorish-Andalusian utopia were the novel's image of what India had been and was losing. The title itself was both provocation and diagnosis: the Moor's last sigh — Boabdil's lament on leaving Granada — proposed that India's syncretic civilisation was being dismantled by people who found its mixture intolerable, and placed that dismantling in a genealogy of civilisational destruction that included the Spanish Inquisition. The novel was feared because it named the loss with a precision and a beauty that made the naming impossible to dismiss as polemic. It was banned for depicting what was happening. It was feared for making what was happening legible.
The Reading
The Backs of Paintings
He was writing on the backs of paintings. This was what it had come to — a dying man in a crumbling castle in Benengeli, Spain, his skin sagging, his joints aching, his body that of a seventy-year-old though the calendar insisted he was barely thirty-six, scrawling his family's history on the only paper available: the reverse sides of the canvases his mother had made. Masterpieces of Indian modernism, now serving as pages for a confession. The paintings Vasco Miranda had stolen and was already covering with his own inferior work — painting over the luminous visions beneath with something smaller, angrier, more provincial. The palimpsest was the point. Beneath every monolithic identity, beneath every assertion that a place belongs to one people and one tradition, there is an older, richer, more complicated text that the new writing cannot entirely erase.
The name was Moraes Zogoiby. The family called him the Moor — a name that carried the entire history of his dynasty in its syllables, descended, according to its own cherished legend, from the Moorish nobleman Boabdil, last sultan of Granada, and from the Jewish merchants who accompanied him into exile after the fall of the Alhambra in 1492. The genetic condition that caused him to age at twice the normal rate had given the already urgent business of telling this story an additional register of desperation. Time was not his to waste. He wrote fast, cramped, breathless, because breath was running out.
Cochin, the First Paradise
The family began in Cochin, on the Malabar Coast — the da Gamas and the Zogoibys, Portuguese Catholic spice merchants and Cochin Jewish traders whose intermarriage produced the extraordinary, combustible, hybrid dynasty that would eventually set the whole of Bombay alight.
Colonial Cochin was dense, fragrant, overloaded with history and spice and religious imagery. Every sentence needed to carry more than it strictly required because excess was the aesthetic principle — the formal equivalent of the cultural hybridity it celebrated. The da Gamas were established through Francisco, who had made the family fortune in pepper and cardamom, and his wife Epifania, whose Catholic piety was a force of nature and whose will bent the household to her purposes with an authority that owed nothing to argument and everything to sheer persistence. Their world was one in which Catholics and Jews and Hindus and Muslims traded and intermarried and bickered and celebrated each other's festivals with the easy familiarity of communities that had lived alongside each other for centuries — Onam and Christmas and Passover and Diwali woven into a single calendar that nobody found contradictory because contradiction was how life was lived. Cochin's pluralism — its comfortable accommodation of difference, its spice-scented ease with multiple faiths and multiple cuisines and multiple languages coexisting in the same streets, the synagogue and the church and the temple within walking distance of each other and all of them within walking distance of the spice warehouses where the real business of the coast was conducted — was the first version of the paradise that would be lost.
The prose was ornate, abundant, overflowing with imagery and allusion, because that style was itself a form of resistance against the simplifications that would destroy the world it celebrated. One language would never be sufficient for a place where four were spoken before breakfast. One story would never contain a family that carried Catholic guilt and Jewish memory and Moorish legend and Indian spice in the same bloodstream. The sentences piled clause upon clause like the warehouses piled sacks of cardamom upon sacks of pepper — excess not as indulgence but as accuracy, because the truth about Cochin was that it was too much, too many flavours and faiths and histories tangled together, and any prose that simplified it would be lying about the nature of the place.
Aurora
Aurora da Gama, their granddaughter, was the blazing centre — a painter of genius, voluptuous, wilful, politically engaged, aesthetically radical, constitutionally incapable of subordinating herself to anyone or anything. Her creative energy was so fierce it burned everyone who came close to it, including her own children. She fell in love with Abraham Zogoiby, the Cochin Jewish merchant who managed her family's business, and their marriage joined two marginalised communities in a union whose children would embody the hybrid identity this story celebrated and mourned.
Abraham was quieter, steadier, more patient — but darker too. His financial dealings became increasingly entangled with the criminal networks that underlay Bombay's commercial prosperity. He was involved in the arms trade, in real estate crime, in the organised violence that shaped the city beneath its surface of democratic normality. Where Aurora created, Abraham accumulated. Where she synthesised, he exploited. Where she painted the plural city in all its beauty, he profited from the same plurality's chaos. Their marriage was both love match and structural metaphor: art and capital, creation and extraction, the two forces that made Bombay simultaneously the most creative and the most criminal city in India, joined in a union whose children would inherit both capacities and suffer from both.
Bombay, the Second Paradise
The family moved to Bombay, and everything transformed. This was the great subject — the city of multiple communities, Parsis and Muslims and Hindus and Catholics and Jews and Jains and Sikhs, of commerce and cinema and art and crime, of the Bollywood industry and the underworld and the trade unions and the Congress politicians and the communists and, eventually, menacingly, the Hindu nationalists whose rise would unmake the city's pluralism. Bombay was the city where everything happened at once and nobody expected it to stop happening, a city that ran on the conviction that its contradictions were not problems to be solved but energies to be channelled, that a place containing this many languages and this many gods and this many ways of cooking fish could not be reduced to a single story and should not try.
Aurora's paintings were the method of rendering this city at its most visionary. She painted a series of enormous canvases depicting the Moor — her son Moraes, whom she used as the central figure — in an imaginary Moorish-Andalusian world, a utopian space where communities lived together without separation, where the boundaries between Hindu and Muslim, Christian and Jew, Cochin and Bombay, East and West dissolved in a luminous synthesis that was at once aesthetic achievement and political argument. The Moor paintings — that was what the critics called them — became Aurora's life's work, a cycle that tracked the decades of Indian independence as it tracked the decades of the family, the nation's history and the family's history superimposed on the same canvases like two transparencies held to the light. The paintings were allegorical representations of Bombay's pluralism raised to the level of art. And as the decades passed and the city darkened, the paintings darkened with it: the Moorish world in them became embattled, then besieged, then burning, then lost. Aurora painted what was coming before it arrived, which is what artists do and what politicians cannot forgive.
Moraes grew up in the shadow of his mother's genius and his own biological acceleration — a man whose body betrayed him by rushing toward death while his mind was still young, still hungry for experience. His siblings were vivid and troubled: the eldest daughter Uma, brilliant and vengeful, became entangled with Aurora's greatest rival in the art world, and her story involved forgery, betrayal, murder, and a long patient vengeance that would not fully resolve until the final pages. The family was a combustion engine — brilliance, love, rivalry, jealousy, money, art, sex, and politics feeding each other in a self-consuming chain reaction that produced masterpieces and casualties in roughly equal measure, mirroring the city itself.
The Men with Sticks
Moraes's passage through the city's underworld took him from the drawing rooms and galleries of his mother's world into the criminal networks his father's business had financed. He became involved with the gangster Mainduck, whose operations connected organised crime to the political machinery of Hindu nationalism — the nexus of gang violence, political protection, police complicity, and communal incitement that defined the city's shadow governance. Mainduck was connected to Raman Fielding and his Mumbai's Axis, and the connection revealed with documentary precision how Hindu nationalist politics and organised crime were not distinct phenomena but interpenetrating ones, each providing the other with what it needed — money, muscle, legitimacy, impunity — in a symbiosis more baroque than any fiction could invent.
Fielding himself was rendered with satirical ferocity. He maintained a menagerie of exotic animals in his compound. He presided over his followers with a mixture of theatrical charm and real menace. He had expressed admiration for Hitler. His organisation's relationship to street violence was that of a conductor to an orchestra: he did not participate directly but his baton controlled the tempo. The portrait was savage but not caricature — it gave Fielding the charisma and the cunning that made the real movement effective, and the result was a character who was frightening precisely because he was convincing. The reader could see why people followed him, could feel the seductive power of his certainty, could understand how a plural, tolerant, chaotic city might find in his brutal simplification a relief from the exhausting complexity of actually living with difference.
The Riots
The communal violence of 1992-93 — the slaughter that followed the destruction of the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya — was the moment when Aurora's Bombay broke apart. The plural city, the city that had been painted as an Andalusia of the imagination where communities coexisted in creative friction, turned on its Muslim residents with a ferocity that the institutions of the city either facilitated or failed to prevent. Neighbourhoods burned. Families that had lived side by side for generations discovered that the proximity was conditional, that the tolerance was shallow, that the neighbours were waiting for permission to become enemies. The permission arrived from Ayodhya like a signal flare, and the city that had prided itself on not being like the rest of India discovered that it was exactly like the rest of India — that the cosmopolitan veneer was a veneer, that the shared festivals and shared streets and shared taxi rides had not produced the shared loyalty that would be required when the men with sticks came asking which god you prayed to.
Aurora was killed — thrown from the roof of her ancestral Bombay home during a confrontation whose details arrived with the compressed violence of a car crash. With her death the tone shifted from tragi-comic maximalism to something more nakedly elegiac, a register of loss sustained through the final movement with a discipline that critics of excess rarely credited. The death of Aurora was the death of the imagination that held Bombay's contradictions together — the artist whose canvases were large enough to contain Hindu and Muslim, Catholic and Jew, ancient and modern in a single composition. Without her, the city had no one painting it whole. The fragments drifted apart. The Moor paintings remained — those that hadn't been sold, those that hadn't been stolen, those that hadn't been slashed by critics of a less literary variety — but the hand that made them was gone, and the vision they embodied had been refuted by the burning streets outside the studio windows.
Benengeli
Moraes, grief-stricken and aging fast — his body now visibly that of an old man though his chronological age was barely thirty — found himself drawn to Spain by Vasco Miranda, an old figure from the art world of Aurora's younger years. Vasco was living in exile in Benengeli — whose name echoed Cide Hamete Benengeli, the fictional Arab narrator of Don Quixote, connecting this Bombay saga to the great novel of the Iberian Peninsula. Vasco possessed several of Aurora's greatest canvases. He was the final captor, the architect of the frame narrative that had opened the story.
Moraes was imprisoned in the castle, writing the story we had been reading on the backs of the paintings Vasco had stolen and was painting over with his own inferior work. The image was the central metaphor made literal: the work of synthesis and imagination — Aurora's Moorish canvases, her visions of a world where difference was not erased but celebrated — literally painted over by a lesser, angrier, more provincial art that could not tolerate what it had covered up and could not match what it had replaced.
Spain, Granada, the Alhambra, the last Moorish civilisation in Christian Europe — these were the historical models for what was being proposed as Bombay's future. Was India's pluralism — the accumulation of communities, languages, and traditions that Nehruvian secularism had tried to institutionalise — destined to repeat the fate of Moorish Andalusia? Would the India of mixtures and accommodations be purified, simplified, reduced to a single dominant identity the way Fernando and Isabella's Spain had been purified by the Inquisition? The question hung over the Spanish landscape like the smell of orange blossom and old stone — a landscape that knew the answer, that had lived through the answer five centuries earlier, and that wore the evidence of the answer in its architecture: the Alhambra's arabesques and the cathedral built inside the mosque of Córdoba and the whitewashed walls of towns whose names remembered the Arabic they no longer spoke.
The Sigh
Moraes died in Spain, in exile, far from the city that had formed him and that had become, in the years of his telling, something he no longer recognised. His body had finally caught up with the rate at which it had always been running — the flesh at last matching the exhaustion that the spirit had carried since childhood, the accelerated aging arriving at its destination, which was the same destination everyone reaches but which he reached while the century was still deciding what it wanted to be. His last sigh echoed Boabdil's — the sigh of a man who had lost his home not through his own weakness but through the strength of forces that found his home's very nature — its mixture, its hybridity, its refusal to be one thing — intolerable. Legend says that Boabdil's mother told him not to weep like a woman for what he could not defend like a man. The cruelty of that remark survived five centuries because cruelty always survives. But the sigh survived too — the gentler sound, the sound of loss without recrimination, the sound of a man who knew that what was lost was not his to defend alone, that it belonged to everyone who had lived in it, and that its destruction was accomplished not by a single failure of courage but by a long, patient, collective decision to find complexity unbearable.
The story that had been told was itself the Moor's last sigh — the final breath of a dying man and a dying civilisation, exhaled onto the backs of paintings that another man was already covering with something else. Beneath every monolithic identity, beneath every purified nation, beneath every assertion that a place belongs to one people and one tradition, there is an older, richer text that the new writing cannot entirely erase, and that the patient reader — the reader willing to turn the page over and look at the other side — can still, with effort and with love and with the kind of attention that only art can sustain, make out.
The plural world is always the most dangerous idea. The breath of a man who loved a city and a civilisation and watched them being unmade by people who could not tolerate the very qualities — mixture, contradiction, creative disorder — that made them worth loving. The sigh was audible if you listened. It carried across the water from Spain to India and back again, five centuries in each direction, the same sound, the same loss, the same men with sticks and the same gardens reduced to rubble, and the same faint, ineradicable trace of what had been there before the men arrived — visible on the backs of paintings, legible in the palimpsest, present in the memory of spice.
This post is part of Books They Tried to Destroy, a series on the Banned, Burned & Dangerous canon — works that frightened states and survived them.
Editions
Alfred A. Knopf, 1995 — first US hardcover edition.
Vintage International, 1997 — Whitbread Prize winner edition.
Disclaimer: some links in this post are affiliate links. If you buy through them, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.